"Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment
and Criminal Justice Supervision."

Anglin, M.D; Longshore, D.; and Turner, S., 1999. Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice & Behavior 26(2):168-195.

*Belenko, S., 1998. Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review 1:1-42.

Belenko, S., 1999. Research on drug courts: A critical review: 1999 update. National Drug Court Institute Review 2(2):1-58.

Belenko, S., 2001. Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review: 2000 Update. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.

Belenko, S., and Peugh, J., 1998. Behind Bars: Substance Abuse and America's Prison Population. New York: National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.

*Cornish, J.W., et al., 1997. Naltrexone pharmacotherapy for opioid dependent federal probationers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 14:529-534.

*Cornish, J., and Marlowe, D.B., in press. Alcohol treatment in the criminal justice system. In B.A. Johnson, P. Ruiz, and M. Galanter (eds.), Alcoholism: A Practical Handbook. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.

Craddock, S.G., et al., 1997. Characteristics and pretreatment behaviors of clients entering drug abuse treatment: 1969 to 1993. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 23(1):43-59.

Deschenes, E.P.; Turner, S.; and Greenwood, P., 1995. Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's drug court. Justice System Journal 18(1): 55-73.

Festinger, D.S., et al., 2002. Status hearings in drug court: When more is less and less is more. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 68(2):151-157.

Gendreau, P., 1996. The Principles of Effective Interventions With Offenders. In A.T. Harland (ed.), Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 117-130.

Gendreau, P; Smith, P.; and Goggin, C., 2001. Treatment Programs in Corrections. In J. Winterdyk (ed.), Corrections in Canada: Social Reactions to Crime. Toronto: Prentice Hall, pp. 238-263.

General Accounting Office, 2002. Drug Courts: Better DOJ Data Collection and Evaluation Efforts Needed To Measure Impact of Drug Court Programs. Publication No. GAO-02-434. Washington, DC: GAO.

Gottfredson, D.C., and Exum, M.L., 2002. The Baltimore City Drug Court: One-year results from a randomized study. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency 39:337-356.

Gottfredson, D.C.; Najaka, S.S.; and Kearley, B., 2003. Effectiveness of drug courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy 2(2). www.criminologyandpublicpolicy.com/search/abstrGottfredson03.php.

Harrell, A., and Roman, J., 2001. Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues 31(1):207-232.

Hubbard, R.L., et al., 1988. The Criminal Justice Client in Drug Abuse Treatment. In C.G. Leukefeld and F.M. Tims (eds.), Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice. NIDA Research Monograph No. 86 (NIH Publication no. ADM-88-1578). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, pp. 57-80.

Knight, K.; Simpson, D.D.; and Hiller, M.L., 1999. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal 79 (3):337-351. Langan, P.A., and Levin, D.J., 2002. Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

*Marlowe, D.B., 2001. Coercive treatment of substance abusing criminal offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 1:65-73.

*Marlowe, D.B., 2002. Effective strategies for intervening with drug-abusing offenders. Villanova Law Review 47:989-1025.

*Marlowe, D.B.; Festinger, D.S.; and Lee, P.A., in press. The judge is a key component of drug court. National Drug Court Institute Review.

*Marlowe, D.B.; Festinger, D.S.; and Lee, P.A., 2003. The role of judicial status hearings in drug court. Offender Substance Abuse Report 3(3):33-46.

*Marlowe, D.B., et al., 2002. A randomized, controlled evaluation of judicial status hearings in drug court: 6 and 12-month outcomes and client-program matching effects [abstract]. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 66:S111-S112. Presentation at the 64th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Quebec City, Canada.

*Marlowe, D.B., et al., 2003. Are judicial status hearings a "key component" of drug court? During-treatment data from a randomized trial. Criminal Justice & Behavior 30:141-162.

Marlowe, D.B., and Kirby, K.C., 1999. Effective use of sanctions in drug courts: Lessons from behavioral research. National Drug Court Institute Review 2(1):1-31.

*Martin, S.S., et al., 1999. Three-year outcomes of therapeutic community treatment for drug-involved offenders in Delaware. Prison Journal 79:294-320.

McLellan, A.T., et al., 2000. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Association 284(13):1689-1695.

*National Institute of Justice, 1999. Annual Report on Drug Use Among Adult and Juvenile Arrestees. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Pearson, F.S., and Lipton, D.S., 1999. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatments for drug abuse. Prison Journal 79(4):384-410.

*Platt, J.J., et al., 1998. Methadone maintenance treatment: Its development and effectiveness after 30 years. In J.A. Inciardi and L.D. Harrison (eds.), Heroin in the Age of Crack-Cocaine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 160-187.

Prendergast, M.L.; Farabee, D.; and Cartier, J., 2001. The impact of in-prison therapeutic community programs on prison management. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 32(3):63-78.

Satel, S.L., 1999. Drug Treatment: The Case for Coercion. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute. Simpson, D.D.; Joe, G.W.; and Brown, B.S., 1997. Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 11(4):294-307.

Stark, M.J., 1992. Dropping out of substance abuse treatment: A clinically oriented review. Clinical Psychology Review 12:93-116.

*Taxman, F.S., 1999a. Graduated sanctions: Stepping into accountable systems and offenders. Prison Journal 79:182-204.

Taxman, F.S., 1999b. Unraveling "what works" for offenders in substance abuse treatment services. National Drug Court Institute Review 2(2):93-134.

Turner, S., et al., 1999. Perceptions of drug court: How offenders view ease of program completion, strengths and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. National Drug Court Institute Review 2(1):61-85.

Young, D.; Usdane, M.; and Torres, L., 1991. Alcohol, Drugs and Crime: Vera's Final Report on New York State's Interagency Initiative. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.

Wexler, H.K., et al., 1999. Three-year reincarceration outcomes for Amity in-prison therapeutic community and aftercare in California. Prison Journal 79:321-336.